In doing so, they succeeded in creating what might be the best film franchise reboot of all time.

Set the film in reality, not the ridiculous parallel universe that the Bond series has always existed in. Take the essence of James Bond and spy movies, and trim all the fat, keeping only what makes them fun, interesting, unique. The team behind Casino Royale were clearly aware of those issues, and they had a genius idea: strip it all away. They must all feature over the top gadgets, a fancy car, a dumb Bond girl, etc - a whole checklist of Bond tropes, which ultimately makes them feel tired and uninspired. Worse yet, the movies are all highly formulaic, adhering to rigid traditions like they're the ten commandments. The humour often conflicts with the movie's tone. The villains are cartoonish and under-developed. His signature move is heading into the villain's lair with no plan whatsoever, relying solely on dumb luck and the sheer improbability that thousands of bullets will all miss him during the inevitable shoot-out.įans have labelled the films 'campy', but I'd call them 'unintentionally really stupid'. He's also a complete moron, unbefittingly so for a spy. He's a bit of an **** and a raging misogynist. But the films themselves never really delivered on that idea.įirst off, James Bond is not suave at all. Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of a Bond film: a spy thriller starring a suave agent, who uses wit to get out of difficult situations. This might sound controversial, but if you take your fan goggles off, Bond movies have always been either pretty bad or just alright.

What movie was after casino royale